Being Opposite: Is there Advantage for Social Competence and Friendships in Being an Opposite Sex Twin?
Laffey-Ardley, Sioban T. & Thorpe, Karen J. (2006) Being Opposite: Is there Advantage for Social Competence and Friendships in Being an Opposite Sex Twin? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9(1), pp. 131-140.
A recent large-scale study of Finnish adolescent twins (Pulkkinen et. al, 2003) reported that individuals from opposite sex twin pairs were more socially adaptive than either individuals from same sex pairs or singletons. This finding raises questions about the social learning effects of being an opposite sex twin. The current paper hypothesised on the basis of this finding, and evidence from singleton populations, that having an opposite sex sibling would yield social advantage. It sought to examine the social competencies of opposite sex pairs and compare them with same sex twins and singletons. The study focused on the preschool years (age 3-6), a period in which the majority of children encounter their first large group, non-familial social experiences.
The study obtained reports from parents and teachers of children aged 3-6 years: 72 children (36 pairs) who were dizygotic opposite sex twins (DZOS), 50 children (25 pairs) who were dizygotic same sex twins (DZSS), and 85 singletons of the same age and sex as the twins, who had at least one sibling. Reports were made using standardised measures of social competencies, behaviour problems, language development and friendships. The main effects found were of differences in social competency between twins and singletons. Twins had lower social competency scores. No differences between same sex and opposite sex twins were found. The findings did not support the hypothesis of social advantage for opposite sex twins in early childhood.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||twins, adaptive behaviour, psychpathology, DZ opposite sex twins, child development, social development|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000) > PSYCHOLOGY (170100) > Developmental Psychology and Ageing (170102)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000) > PSYCHOLOGY (170100) > Personality Abilities and Assessment (170109)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 Australian Academic Press|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||01 Jun 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:19|
Repository Staff Only: item control page