Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications
Hamilton, Kristen R., Mitchell, Marci R., Wing, Victoria C., Balodis, Iris M., Bickel, Warren, Fillmore, Mark, Lane, Scott D., Lejuez, C. W., Littlefield, Andrew K., Luijten, Maartje, Mathias, Charles W., Mitchell, Suzanne H., Napier, T. Celeste, Reynolds, Brady, Schütz, Christian G., Setlow, Barry, Sher, Kenneth J., Swann, Alan C., Tedford, Stephanie E., White, Melanie J., Winstanley, Catharine, Yi, Richard, Potenza, Marc N., & Moeller, F. Gerard (2015) Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications. Personality Disorders : Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6(2), pp. 182-198.
Impulsivity critically relates to many psychiatric disorders. Given the multifaceted construct that impulsivity represents, defining core aspects of impulsivity is vital for the assessment and understanding of clinical conditions. Choice impulsivity (CI), involving the preferential selection of smaller sooner rewards over larger later rewards, represents one important type of impulsivity.
The International Society for Research on Impulsivity (InSRI) convened to discuss the definition and assessment of CI and provide recommendations regarding measurement across species.
Commonly used preclinical and clinical CI behavioral tasks are described, and considerations for each task are provided to guide CI task selection. Differences in assessment of CI (self-report, behavioral) and calculating CI indices (e.g., area-under-the-curve, indifference point, steepness of discounting curve) are discussed along with properties of specific behavioral tasks used in preclinical and clinical settings.
The InSRI group recommends inclusion of measures of CI in human studies examining impulsivity. Animal studies examining impulsivity should also include assessments of CI and these measures should be harmonized in accordance with human studies of the disorders being modeled in the preclinical investigations. The choice of specific CI measures to be included should be based on the goals of the study and existing preclinical and clinical literature using established CI measures.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||impulsivity, response, attention, behavioral control, personality, delay discounting, delay of gratification, self-control|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Psychology & Counselling
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2014 American Psychological Association|
|Deposited On:||29 Oct 2014 23:45|
|Last Modified:||03 May 2015 17:22|
Repository Staff Only: item control page