Setting aside agreements reached at court annexed mediation: procedural grounds and the role of unconscionability
Cockburn, Tina L. & Shirley, Melinda J. (2003) Setting aside agreements reached at court annexed mediation: procedural grounds and the role of unconscionability. The University of Western Australia Law Review, 31(1), pp. 70-86.
There is an emerging body of case-law concerning the circumstances in which an agreement reached at mediation may be set aside both at law and in equity. In such cases procedural aspects of the mediation in question are often challenged and equitable intervention may be sought on the basis of an alleged unconscionalbe bargain. This article considers some of the circumstances in which a mediation agreement may be set aside at law or in equity.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||For more information, please refer to the journal's website (see hypertext link) or contact the author: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law not elsewhere classified (180199)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2003 (The author)|
|Deposited On:||30 May 2007|
|Last Modified:||12 Feb 2015 00:32|
Repository Staff Only: item control page