In our shared conversations about young children and all that impacts on their lives, we are adept at holding together ideas and concepts which others might consider opposites. For instance, we are comfortable with the notion of education and care, work and play, children and their families. We do not feel the need to choose one over the other, allocate one more importance than the other, nor place in a hierarchical order. This is not even a matter of finding a balanceâ€”we know that both are necessary and true (McArdle & McWilliam, 2005). Early childhood professionals are better at living with contradictions than we know. We live with ideas which do not always sit well with each other, but remain in tension. But maybe we are not so good at articulating these ways of thinking in our dealings with others.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||early childhood, education, globalisation|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000) > EDUCATION SYSTEMS (130100) > Early Childhood Education (excl. Maori) (130102)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education
Past > Institutes > Information Security Institute
Current > Schools > School of Early Childhood
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 Early Childhood Australia Inc.|
|Copyright Statement:||: Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher : This journal is available online.|
|Deposited On:||30 May 2007|
|Last Modified:||22 Mar 2015 22:53|
Repository Staff Only: item control page