Comparison of four expert elicitation methods : For Bayesian logistic regression and classification trees

O'Leary, Rebecca, Mengersen, Kerrie, Murray, J, & Low-Choy, Sama (2009) Comparison of four expert elicitation methods : For Bayesian logistic regression and classification trees. In RD, Anderssen, RD, Braddock, & H, Newham (Eds.) Proceedings: 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, 13-17 July 2009, Australia, Queensland, Cairns.

Impact and interest:

1 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 80684
Item Type: Conference Paper
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Bayesian Classification and Regression Trees, Bayesian Logistic Regression, Expert Elicitation, Informative Priors
ISBN: 978-0-9758400-7-8
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (010000) > STATISTICS (010400) > Applied Statistics (010401)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (010000) > STATISTICS (010400) > Statistical Theory (010405)
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Science and Technology
Deposited On: 21 Jan 2015 22:49
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2015 02:58

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page