Life is too short to RTFM : how users relate to documentation and excess features in consumer products

Blackler, Alethea L., Gomez, Rafael E., Popovic, Vesna, & Thompson, Helen (2016) Life is too short to RTFM : how users relate to documentation and excess features in consumer products. Interacting with Computers, 28(1), pp. 27-46.

View at publisher


This paper addresses two common problems that users of various products and interfaces encounter— over-featured interfaces and product documentation. Over-featured interfaces are seen as a problem as they can confuse and over-complicate everyday interactions. Researchers also often claim that users do not read product documentation, although they are often exhorted to ‘RTFM’(read the field manual).We conducted two sets of studies with users which looked at the issues of both manuals and excess features with common domestic and personal products. The quantitative set was a series of questionnaires administered to 170 people over 7 years. The qualitative set consisted of two 6-month longitudinal studies based on diaries and interviews with a total of 15 participants. We found that manuals are not read by the majority of people, and most do not use all the features of the products that they own and use regularly. Men are more likely to do both than women, and younger people are less likely to use manuals than middle-aged and older ones. More educated people are also less likely to read manuals. Over-featuring and being forced to consult manuals also appears to cause negative emotional experiences. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Impact and interest:

0 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

34 since deposited on 03 Feb 2015
25 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 80826
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: user centered design, user interface design, empirical studies in interaction design, accessability
DOI: 10.1093/iwc/iwu023
ISSN: 1873-7951
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Creative Industries Faculty
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
Copyright Owner: © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Computer Society. All rights reserved
Copyright Statement: For Permissions, please email:
Deposited On: 03 Feb 2015 23:55
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2017 08:36

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page