A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour
Turrell, Gavin, Blakely, Tony, Patterson, Carla M., & Oldenburg, Brian F. (2004) A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(3), pp. 208-215.
Study objective: To examine the association between area- and individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) and food purchasing behaviour. Design: The sample comprised 1000 households and 50 small areas, selected using a stratified two-stage cluster design. Data were collected by face-to-face interview (66.4% response rate). SES was measured using a composite area index of disadvantage (mean 1026.8, sd=95.2) and household income. Purchasing behaviour was scored as continuous indices ranging from 0 to 100 for three food-types: fruits (mean 50.5, sd=17.8), vegetables (61.8, 15.2), and grocery items (51.4, 17.6), with higher scores indicating purchasing patterns more consistent with dietary guideline recommendations.
Setting: Brisbane metropolitan region, Australia, 2000 Participants: Persons aged 16-94 who were primarily responsible for their household’s food purchasing. Main results: Controlling for age, gender, and household income, a two standard deviation increase on the area-based SES measure was associated with a 2.01 unit-increase on the fruit purchasing index (95% CI -0.49 to 4.50). The corresponding associations for vegetables and grocery foods were 0.60 (-1.36 to 2.56) and 0.94 (-1.35 to 3.23). Prior to controlling for household income, significant area-level differences were found for each food, suggesting that clustering of household income within areas (a composition effect) accounted for the food purchasing variability between them.
Conclusions: Living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area was associated with a tendency to have a healthier food purchasing profile, however, the magnitude of the association was weak-to-moderate and the 95% confidence intervals for area-SES included the null. Even though urban areas in Brisbane are differentiated on the basis of their socioeconomic characteristics, it seems unlikely that where you live shapes your procurement of food over and above your personal characteristics. This is in contrast to metropolitan regions of the US and Britain, where spatial segregation along socioeconomic lines is large enough to be detectable in people's food behaviour and dietary intakes.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Socioeconomic status, diet, health inequalities|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES (111700)|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2004 BMJ Publishing Group|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||19 Jun 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:05|
Repository Staff Only: item control page