Antisocial personality disorder and therapeutic justice court programs
Cannon, Andrew J., Doley, Rebekah, Ferguson, Claire, & Brooks, Nathan (2012) Antisocial personality disorder and therapeutic justice court programs. Journal of Judicial Administration, 22(2), pp. 99-128.
It has become commonplace for courts to supervise an offender as part of the sentencing process. Many of them have Anti Social Personality Disorder (ASPD). The focus of this article is how the work of specialist and/or problem solving courts can be informed by the insights of the psychology profession into the best practice in the treatment and management of people with ASPD. It is a legitimate purpose of legal work to consider and improve the well-being of the participants in the legal process. Programs designed specifically to deal with those with ASPD could be incorporated into existing Drug Courts, or implemented separately by courts to aid with reforming offenders with ASPD and in managing the re-entry of offenders into the community as part of their sentence. For the success of this initiative on the part of the court, ASPD will need to be specifically diagnosed and treated. Close co-operation between courts and psychologists is required to improve the effectiveness of court programs to treat people with ASPD and to evaluate their success.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000) > PSYCHOLOGY (170100) > Forensic Psychology (170104)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Criminal Law and Procedure (180110)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Justice
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited|
|Copyright Statement:||Please note that this article is being
provided for research purposes and is not
to be reproduced in any way. If you refer to
the article, please ensure you acknowledge
both the publication and publisher
appropriately. The citation for the journal is
available in the footline of each page.
Should you wish to reproduce this article,
either in part or in its entirety, in any medium,
please ensure you seek permission from our
Please email any queries to
|Deposited On:||01 Mar 2015 23:52|
|Last Modified:||06 Mar 2015 23:58|
Repository Staff Only: item control page