Designing risk into the design studio
Hedley, Peter W., Smith, Dianne J., & Fermer, David J. (2007) Designing risk into the design studio. In Proceedings 'At Risk' conference, Wellington, New Zealand, July 2-6, 2007, Wellington, New Zealand.
In 2006, course structures were standardized across the Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering. As a consequence, a number of changes were required, including the time available to teach interior design being reduced from six to four hours per week. We were driven to seek an alternative to the traditional ‘studio based’ learning model even if it involved risk. Using an intensive experience-based learning process, a new Learning and Teaching Model combined information and ideas with planned experiences. Action research is integral to the Model.
Outcomes include highly engaged students, group ownership of content and teaching amongst the staff, and a transparency of course content that offers all parties common ground from which to discuss changes and improvements. The Model facilitates student-directed learning. The first year design units outlined are a useful vehicle to identify and discuss the risks involved in embracing change within the university context. The aim of this paper is to identify risks and to propose a process to manage risk embedded in innovations. The Model also offers a successful alternative to the traditional project-based studio format, and could be adopted to any of the design disciplines.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page