Taylor, Mark (2003) Surface talk. Architectural Design, 73(2), pp. 30-35.
Until now our view of surface has been informed by the structure/ornament debate. For Vitruvius and most recently the modernists, the surface was an additional upper or outer layer extraneous to true tectonic structure, whereas for Gottfried Semper it was an ornamented textile supported by solid form. The use of digital design tools, however, has blurred the boundaries and rendered both camps' ideas redundant. For designers creating contiguous virtual and material surfaces it is no longer applicable to consider where architecture's tectonic origins lay in the temple or the tent. This paper proposes that the ideas of the philosopher Avrum Stroll could lead us to wholly new perceptions about surface as both a physical and an abstract entity.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Architecture Philosophy, Aesthetics, Digital Design|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING (120500) > History and Theory of the Built Environment (excl. Architecture) (120502)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > ARCHITECTURE (120100)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > ARCHITECTURE (120100) > Architectural Design (120101)
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Creative Industries Faculty
Past > Schools > School of Design
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2003 John Wiley and Sons|
|Deposited On:||10 Jan 2008|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:28|
Repository Staff Only: item control page