U v U  HCA 36: Commentary
Field, Rachael (2014) U v U  HCA 36: Commentary. In Douglas, Heather, Bartlett, Francesca, Luker, Trish, & Hunter, Rosemary (Eds.) Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law. Hart Publishing Ltd., Oxford and Portland, pp. 361-364.
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
This commentary offers a feminist analysis of relocation cases through the lens of U v U  HCA 36, and with reference to the re-written judgment for the Australian Feminist Judgments project. First, the commentary considers the gendered nature of relocation cases, and analyses aspects of the reasoning and outcome of U v U that are of concern from a feminist perspective. Second, the commentary discusses how the re-written judgment addresses these concerns, thereby offering a feminist judgment on the issue of relocation in family law.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Keywords:||feminist, legal judgments, relocation cases, family law|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2014 Hart Publishing Ltd.|
|Deposited On:||27 Apr 2015 01:57|
|Last Modified:||16 May 2016 04:08|
Repository Staff Only: item control page