Rip, mix, burn: The politics of peer to peer and copyright law
Bowrey, Kathy & Rimmer, Matthew (2002) Rip, mix, burn: The politics of peer to peer and copyright law. First Monday, 7(8).
Whereas Lessig's recent work engages with questions of culture and creativity in society, this paper looks at the role of culture and creativity in the law. The paper evaluates the Napster, DeCSS, Felten and Sklyarov litigation in terms of the new social, legal, economic and cultural relations being produced. This involves a deep discussion of law's economic relations, and the implications of this for litigation strategy. The paper concludes with a critique of recent attempts to define copyright law in terms of first amendment rights and communicative freedom.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||2600 Magazine, constitutional law, Copyright law, Dmitry Sklyarov, Ed Felten, first amendment rights, Freenet, Kazaa, Napster, peer to peer networks, technological protection measures, Intellectual Property and Innovation Law Research Group|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2002 Matthew Rimmer|
|Deposited On:||21 Aug 2015 02:23|
|Last Modified:||07 Sep 2015 02:45|
Repository Staff Only: item control page