Submission on the Hawke Interim Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)
Holcombe, Sarah, Rimmer, Matthew, & Janke, Terri (2009) Submission on the Hawke Interim Review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
There are currently no regulatory mechanisms, laws or policies that specifically provide rights to Indigenous peoples over their Indigenous knowledge and intellectual property. We strongly recommend that the commonwealth take the lead to ensure that national sui generis laws are developed (perhaps to operate initially in areas of Cth jurisdiction, such as IPAs and national parks). The development of such laws should be in tandem with practical guidelines to assist their implementation. A comprehensive, nationally consistent scheme for access to genetic resources, which offers meaningful protection of traditional knowledge and substantive benefit-sharing with Indigenous communities, has to be developed. There are already a range of reports/resources that urge these same reforms and that we direct the Enquiry to again; these include the Voumard Report (2000) – especially Fourmile’s Appendix 10 – “Indigenous Interests”, and Terri Jankes “Our Culture, Our Future (1998).
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Keywords:||Australia's Environment and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous knowledge, Intellectual property, Intellectual Property and Innovation Law Research Group|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2009 The Authors|
|Deposited On:||12 Nov 2015 02:35|
|Last Modified:||31 Oct 2016 22:18|
Repository Staff Only: item control page