The Problem of the Pro-War Greens
Page, James S. (2007) The Problem of the Pro-War Greens. AQ: Australian Quarterly, 79(4), 23-25, 40.
The Green Parties or Greens have emerged as an important international political force in recent years. A crucial policy of the Greens is a commitment to peace and nonviolence. Yet a close analysis of the actions of the leadership of the Greens indicates that this commitment is not as clear as would appear. It is concluded that the leadership of the Green Parties is either manipulative of peace concerns or ignorant of what is involved in genuine commitment to peace and nonviolence. Those committed to peace and nonviolence ought to think carefully before supporting the Greens.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||The Greens, Australian Greens, German Greens, New Zealand Greens, Green Party, Green Parties, Global Greens, peace, nonviolence, war, Gulf War, Iraqi War, invasion of Iraq, Kurds, non, violent resolution of conflict, Tasmanian Parliament, Gulf War, Bob Brown, Senator Bob Brown, Kerry Nettle, Senator Kerry Nettle, Kosovo War, bombing of Serbia, invasion of Afghanistan, heckling, George W, Bush, George Bush, Australian Parliament, human rights, political prisoners, Mamdouh Habib, David Hicks, Amnesty International, invasion of Iraq, withdrawal, Hague Convention, Geneva Convention, Petra Kelly, inconsistency, fraud, guru, gurus, opportunist, opportunists, James Page, James Smith Page, Jim Page, Dr James Page|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLITICAL SCIENCE (160600) > Political Theory and Political Philosophy (160609)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLITICAL SCIENCE (160600) > Australian Government and Politics (160601)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLITICAL SCIENCE (160600) > Defence Studies (160604)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLITICAL SCIENCE (160600) > International Relations (160607)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Social Change Research
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > QUT Carseldine - Humanities & Human Services
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 Australian Institute of Policy and Science|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher|
|Deposited On:||22 Aug 2007 00:00|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 12:42|
Repository Staff Only: item control page