Newsmaking criminology or infotainment criminology? A decontextualised, fragmented and misconstrued critique
Jeffries, Samantha (2002) Newsmaking criminology or infotainment criminology? A decontextualised, fragmented and misconstrued critique. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(2), pp. 286-295.
This article is a response to the critique of the author's PhD thesis methodology and findings presented in Judith Buckingham's article titled "Newsmaking Criminology" or "Infotainment" Criminology? It explains in more detail the author's thesis study and provides responses to Buckingham's arguments.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Gender, courts, sentencing, remand|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Property Law (excl. Intellectual Property Law) (180124)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Justice
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2002 Australian Academic Press|
|Deposited On:||16 Jul 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:19|
Repository Staff Only: item control page