Errors in measuring sagittal arch kinematics of the human foot with digital fluoroscopy
Wearing, Scott C., Smeathers, James E., Yates, Bede, Sullivan, Patrick M., Urry, Stephen R., & Dubois, Philip (2005) Errors in measuring sagittal arch kinematics of the human foot with digital fluoroscopy. Gait & Posture, 21(3), pp. 326-332.
Although fluoroscopy has been used to evaluate motion of the foot during gait, the accuracy and precision of fluoroscopic measures of osseous structures of the foot has not been reported in the literature. This study reports on a series of experiments that quantify the magnitude and sources of error involved in digital fluoroscopic measurements of the medial longitudinal arch. The findings indicate that with a global distortion correction procedure, errors arising from image distortion can be reduced threefold to 0.2 degrees for angular measurements and to 0.1 mm for linear measures. The limits of agreement for repeated angular measures of the calcaneus and first metatarsal were ±0.5 degrees and ±0.6 degrees, indicating that measurement error was primarily associated with the manual process of digitisation. While the magnitude of the residual error constitutes about ±2.5% of the expected 20 degrees of movement of the calcaneus and first metatarsal, out-of-plane rotation may potentially contribute the greatest source of error in fluoroscopic measures of the foot. However, even at the extremes of angular displacement (15 degrees) reported for the calcaneum during running gait, the root mean square (RMS) error was only about 1 degrees. Thus, errors associated with fluoroscopic imaging of the foot appear to be negligible when compared to those arising from skin movement artefact, which typically range between 1.5 and 4 mm (equating to errors of 2 degrees to 17 degrees for angular measures). Fluoroscopy, therefore, may be a useful technique for analysing the sagittal movement of the medial longitudinal arch during the contact phase of walking.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (see hypertext link) or contact the author. Author contact details: email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Keywords:||Accuracy, Precision, Foot, X, ray, Motion analysis|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > ENGINEERING (090000) > BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (090300) > Biomedical Engineering not elsewhere classified (090399)|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2005 Elsevier|
|Deposited On:||16 Jul 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 13:15|
Repository Staff Only: item control page