Comparison of the effects of litigation and ADR in South-East Queensland
Gill, Anika, Gray, Jason, Skitmore, Martin, & Callaghan, Stephen (2015) Comparison of the effects of litigation and ADR in South-East Queensland. The International Journal of Construction Management, 15(3), pp. 254-263.
Administrators only until 27 January 2017 | Request a copy from author
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as arbitration, are often used instead of litigation to resolve construction disputes, as industry folklore considers litigation overly expensive and time-consuming. But is this actually the case? Do the people most involved in construction dispute resolution agree? What are the real advantages and disadvantages of using litigation or ADR? When, if ever, is litigation the most appropriate way of resolving construction disputes? To answer these questions, this paper first provides a review of the literature on the use of litigation and ADR for construction dispute resolution. This is followed by the results of a survey of construction and legal personnel with moderate to extensive experience of dispute resolution in the Australian South-East Queensland construction industry. The main results of this are that, in addition to litigation being more expensive in money and time than ADR methods, the nature of the existing relationship between the parties has an important effect on the resolution process, what happens after an unsuccessful ADR and, if adversarial, is more likely to lead to litigation. The results are then validated and verified by one of the most experienced practitioners in claims and disputes in the whole of Australia.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Construction disputes, Litigation, Alternative dispute resolution|
|Divisions:||Current > Schools > School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2015 Taylor & Francis|
|Copyright Statement:||The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published
and is available in International Journal of Construction Management, 27 July 2015,
|Deposited On:||07 Sep 2015 04:00|
|Last Modified:||15 Sep 2015 06:46|
Repository Staff Only: item control page