Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

Wang, Qianxi, Zhang, Xiaoling, Wu, Yuzhe, & Skitmore, Martin (2015) Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness? Habitat International, 50, pp. 226-233.

[img] PDF (120kB)
Administrators only until December 2018 | Request a copy from author
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

View at publisher

Abstract

With the level of urbanization in China now exceeding 50%, its collective rural land system is under increasing pressure, creating conditions in which there is increasing conflict between the efficient use of land for agricultural purposes and its retention as security for the rural population. This paper first examines the fundamental nature of China's collective land system by analyzing the collectivization history of China, then provides a comprehensive appraisal of the strengths and weaknesses of the collective land system's role in history and the challenges it faces in modern times. The main changes needed for the current collective system are identified as (1) the establishment of a new transfer mechanism for potential collective construction land, (2) the completion of land rights verification and consolidation work, and (3) the endowment of villagers with more rights to enjoy the distribution of land incremental value. The paper's main contribution is to question the relevance of collective rural land system in contemporary China, where a shift is now taking place from one of pure economic development to one involving more social concerns, and propose potential viable amendments to integrate the need for both perspectives.

Impact and interest:

4 citations in Scopus
3 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 87578
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Collective land ownership, Land rights, Privatization, Efficiency, Justice, Reform, China
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.035
ISSN: 0197-3975
Divisions: Current > Schools > School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Deposited On: 22 Sep 2015 03:10
Last Modified: 27 Sep 2015 05:08

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page