Can a court protect an ex-addict from themselves?
Jackson, Sheryl (2015) Can a court protect an ex-addict from themselves? Proctor, 35(10), pp. 42-43.
In Hewitt v Bayntum & Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd  QSC 250 the court was asked to sanction a compromise of a proceeding by a plaintiff who, though a recovering drug addict, was able to give instructions and understand the proposed compromise.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Public Trustee Act 1978 s59, Guardianship and Administration Act 2000, potential for plaintiff to suffer incapacity in future, whether court sanction required, whether transfer to QCAT appropriate|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2015 The author|
|Deposited On:||17 Nov 2015 02:04|
|Last Modified:||18 Nov 2015 00:41|
Repository Staff Only: item control page