No win no fee - no lien and no costs
Jackson, Sheryl (2015) No win no fee - no lien and no costs. Proctor, 35(11), pp. 40-41.
In Lupker v Shine Lawyers Pty Ltd  QSC 278 Bond J considered the implications for a law practice in relation to its entitlement to recovery of its professional fees when the client terminates a no win no fee retainer.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||termination of no win no fee retainer, whether entitlement to payment for completed work, whether possessory lien over file until fees paid|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Legal Practice Lawyering and the Legal Profession (180121)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Deposited On:||04 Jan 2016 03:49|
|Last Modified:||05 Jan 2016 00:02|
Repository Staff Only: item control page