Costs on review - what charges are appropriate?
Jackson, Sheryl & Garrett, Paul (2015) Costs on review - what charges are appropriate? Proctor, 35(7), pp. 40-42.
In Picamore Pty Ltd v Challen  QDC 067 McGill DCJ considered the nature of a review under r742 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) (UCPR) in the context of a review of a costs assessment conducted under the Legal Profession Act 2007 (Qld). His Honour increased the amount that had been allowed by the costs assessor for a number of items.
The judgment includes observations about what may appropriately be charged for particular items of legal work.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||costs assessment under the Legal Profession Act 2007, review by court, nature of review, criteria for assessment, principles applying to charges for particular items of legal work|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Legal Practice Lawyering and the Legal Profession (180121)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Litigation Adjudication and Dispute Resolution (180123)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Deposited On:||05 Jan 2016 00:53|
|Last Modified:||06 Jan 2016 00:12|
Repository Staff Only: item control page