Recognition and enforcement in cross-border insolvency law: A proposal for judicial gap-filling
Gopalan, Sandeep & Guihot, Michael (2015) Recognition and enforcement in cross-border insolvency law: A proposal for judicial gap-filling. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 48(5), pp. 1225-1284.
This Article analyzes the recognition and enforcement of cross-border insolvency judgments from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia to determine whether the UNCITRAL Model Law’s goal of modified universalism is currently being practiced, and subjects the Model Law to analysis through the lens of international relations theories to elaborate a way forward. We posit that courts could use the express language of the Model Law text to confer recognition and enforcement of foreign insolvency judgments. The adoption of our proposal will reduce costs, maximize recovery for creditors, and ensure predictability for all parties.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Cross-border insolvency, Bankruptcy, Insolvency, Commercial Law|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Commercial & Property Law Research Centre
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2016 Vanderbilt University|
|Deposited On:||13 Jan 2016 23:47|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2016 22:39|
Repository Staff Only: item control page