Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context

Marre, Jean-Baptiste, Pascoe, Sean, Thebaud, Olivier, Jennings, Sarah, Boncoeur, Jean, & Coglan, Louisa (2016) Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context. Journal of Environmental Management, 173, pp. 141-150.

View at publisher


Ecosystem based management requires the integration of various types of assessment indicators. Understanding stakeholders' information preferences is important, in selecting those indicators that best support management and policy. Both the preferences of decision-makers and the general public may matter, in democratic participatory management institutions. This paper presents a multi-criteria analysis aimed at quantifying the relative importance to these groups of economic, ecological and socio-economic indicators usually considered when managing ecosystem services in a coastal development context. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied within two nationwide surveys in Australia, and preferences of both the general public and decision-makers for these indicators are elicited and compared. Results show that, on average across both groups, the priority in assessing a generic coastal development project is for the ecological assessment of its impacts on marine biodiversity. Ecological assessment indicators are globally preferred to both economic and socio-economic indicators regardless of the nature of the impacts studied. These results are observed for a significantly larger proportion of decision-maker than general public respondents, questioning the extent to which the general public's preferences are well reflected in decision-making processes.

Impact and interest:

0 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 92767
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Analytic hierarchy process, Australia, Coastal development, Ecosystem services assessment, Information preferences, Multi-criteria analysis
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.025
ISSN: 0301-4797
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Schools > School of Economics & Finance
Deposited On: 09 Feb 2016 22:51
Last Modified: 21 Jun 2016 02:55

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page