Arts, gentrification, and planning for creativity

Grodach, Carl (2016) Arts, gentrification, and planning for creativity. Carolina Planning Journal, 41.

[img] Accepted Version (PDF 98kB)
Administrators only until December 2016 | Request a copy from author

View at publisher

Abstract

Recent decades have seen an almost obsessive focus on creativity in an urban development context. Yet, creativity has come to be prized not so much for the intrinsic values of imagination, innovation and experimentation as for the possibility to exploit these qualities as a means of urban revitalization and wealth generation. This policy emphasis has both contributed to the misplaced assumption that artistic activity causes gentrification and displacement while, at the same time, often setting in motion programs that are detrimental to the creative environments such policies claim to support. It is time to end the current approach to creative city planning, which treats the arts as amenities to catalyze land development and lure upscale consumption.

Impact and interest:

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 93629
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional Information: Volumne 41: Just Creativity: Perspectives on Inclusive Placemaking. A digital version of this edition will be available in late 2016
Keywords: arts, gentrification, creative cities, cultural policy, urban planning
ISSN: 0164-0070
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING (120500)
Divisions: Current > Schools > School of Civil Engineering & Built Environment
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
Copyright Owner: 2016 UNC, Chapel Hill, Department of City and Regional Planning.
Deposited On: 10 Mar 2016 03:36
Last Modified: 31 Aug 2016 23:56

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page