Criteria for evaluating research outcomes
Skitmore, Martin & Runeson, Goran (1996) Criteria for evaluating research outcomes. In Australian Universities Building Educators Association Annual Conference, 16-8 July 1996, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne.
This paper examines the characteristics of good theses, dissertations, papers, and grant applications. A set of axioms are proposed which are claimed to be necessary and sufficient for judging the quality of such works in the field of construction management and economics
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Item (Poster)|
|Keywords:||Construction management and economics, research, evaluation, theses, dissertations, papers, grant applications|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Quantity Surveying (120203)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Building Construction Management and Project Planning (120201)
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1996 (please consult author)|
|Deposited On:||13 Sep 2007|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 12:45|
Repository Staff Only: item control page