Spotless decided per incuriam? - A contrary view
The article considers the implications of the decision of the High Court in Spotless Services Pty Ltd (1996) 141 ALR 92; 34 ATR 183. It argues in particular that the decision was made per incuriam.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||FCT v Spotless Services Pty Ltd (1996) 141 ALR 92, whether decided per incuriam, whether binding precedent|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Taxation Law (180125)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Deposited On:||07 Apr 2016 22:55|
|Last Modified:||07 Apr 2016 22:55|
Repository Staff Only: item control page