Student perception of a new integrated anatomy practical program: Does students' prior learning make a difference?

Tedman, R. A., Alexander, Heather, Massa, H., & Moses, D. (2011) Student perception of a new integrated anatomy practical program: Does students' prior learning make a difference? Clinical Anatomy, 24(5), pp. 664-670.

View at publisher

Abstract

While there is evidence that science and non-science background students display small differences in performance in basic and clinical sciences, early in a 4-year, graduate entry medical program, this lessens with time. With respect to anatomy knowledge, there are no comparable data as to the impact previous anatomy experience has on the student perception of the anatomy practical learning environment. A study survey was designed to evaluate student perception of the anatomy practical program and its impact on student learning, for the initial cohort of a new medical school. The survey comprised 19 statements requiring a response using a 5-point Likert scale, in addition to a free text opportunity to provide opinion of the perceived educational value of the anatomy practical program. The response rate for a total cohort of 82 students was 89%. The anatomy practical program was highly valued by the students in aiding their learning of anatomy, as indicated by the high mean scores for all statements (range: 4.04-4.7). There was a significant difference between the students who had and had not studied a science course prior to entering medicine, with respect to statements that addressed aspects of the course related to its structure, organization, variety of resources, linkage to problem-based learning cases, and fairness of assessment. Nonscience students were more positive compared to those who had studied science before (P levels ranging from 0.004 to 0.035). Students less experienced in anatomy were more challenged in prioritizing core curricular knowledge. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Impact and interest:

6 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
3 citations in Web of Science®

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 95212
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Anatomy, Education, Instrument, MBBS, Practical, Student background, article, human, medical education, medical school, medical student, perception, priority journal, problem based learning, questionnaire, reliability, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dissection, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Problem-Based Learning, Program Evaluation, Students, Medical, HERN
DOI: 10.1002/ca.21180
ISSN: 08973806
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Deposited On: 29 Apr 2016 02:52
Last Modified: 03 May 2016 03:03

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page