Efficacy of family mediation and the role of family violence: Study protocol
Cleak, Helen, Schofield, Margot, & Bickerdike, Andrew (2014) Efficacy of family mediation and the role of family violence: Study protocol. BMC Public Health, 14, Article No. 57.
Family law reforms in Australia require separated parents in dispute to attempt mandatory family dispute resolution (FDR) in community-based family services before court attendance. However, there are concerns about such services when clients present with a history of high conflict and family violence. This study protocol describes a longitudinal study of couples presenting for family mediation services. The study aims to describe the profile of family mediation clients, including type of family violence, and determine the impact of violence profiles on FDR processes and outcomes, such as the type and durability of shared parenting arrangements and clients’ satisfaction with mediated agreements.
A mixed method, naturalistic longitudinal design is used. The sampling frame is clients presenting at nine family mediation centres across metropolitan, outer suburban, and regional/rural sites in Victoria, Australia. Data are collected at pre-test, completion of mediation, and six months later. Self-administered surveys are administered at the three time points, and a telephone interview at the final post-test. The key study variable is family violence. Key outcome measures are changes in the type and level of acrimony and violent behaviours, the relationship between violence and mediated agreements, the durability of agreements over six months, and client satisfaction with mediation.
Family violence is a major risk to the physical and mental health of women and children. This study will inform debates about the role of family violence and how to manage it in the family mediation context. It will also inform decision-making about mediation practices by better understanding how mediation impacts on parenting agreements, and the implications for children, especially in the context of family violence.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||MARITAL CONFLICT, YOUNG-ADULTS, Coercive behaviour, Separated couples, MENTAL-HEALTH, CTS2, CONFLICT-TACTICS-SCALES, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, Family violence, PROTECTIVE FACTORS, COURT, DIVORCE, RELIABILITY, Conflict tactics scale, Family mediation, Financial control, PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, Family Conflict - psychology, Domestic Violence - psychology, Domestic Violence - prevention & control, Social service, Social aspects, Parenting, Laws, regulations and rules, Separation (Law)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Public Health & Social Work
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2014 Cleak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.|
|Copyright Statement:||This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.|
|Deposited On:||12 May 2016 22:34|
|Last Modified:||17 May 2016 01:19|
Repository Staff Only: item control page