The legitimising processes of a new regulator: the case of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission
Artiach, Tracy, Irvine, Helen J., Mack, Janet, & Ryan, Christine M. (2016) The legitimising processes of a new regulator: the case of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), pp. 802-827.
Purpose This paper strengthens our theoretical understanding of the processes through which a new regulator seeks to gain legitimacy within an existing regulatory space. We do this by investigating the case of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit Commission (ACNC).
Design/methodology/approach Synthesising legitimacy theory with the concept of regulatory space, we analyse formal public discourse surrounding the establishment and operations of the ACNC.
Findings Regulation is essentially a context-bound political process in which a new regulator needs to establish legitimacy to ensure its survival. It must convince its constituents that it has developed processes to operate effectively and professionally in addressing constituents’ needs, to bargain authoritatively with other regulators in establishing its operational boundaries, and to engage politically with government and constituents. Over a relatively short time, the ACNC built legitimacy, despite the political threats to its formal regulatory authority.
Research limitations/implications Our conclusions are based on our analysis of one case. There is scope for further investigations of the processes by which new regulators establish their legitimacy in different contexts.
Practical implications The potential for a political threat to the authority of a new regulator, and the difficulty of achieving regulatory reform, particularly in a federated system such as Australia, highlight the necessity for a new regulator to develop a compelling discourse of legitimacy.
Originality/value We synthesise regulatory space and legitimacy perspectives, contributing to an understanding of the processes of regulation.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Regulation, Legitimacy, Not-for-profit, Regulatory space, ACNC|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY (150100) > Auditing and Accountability (150102)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY (150100) > Accounting Auditing and Accountability not elsewhere classified (150199)
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Schools > School of Accountancy
|Deposited On:||09 Jun 2016 05:30|
|Last Modified:||15 Jun 2016 15:42|
Repository Staff Only: item control page