A principled framework for assessing general anti-avoidance regimes
The enactment of general anti-avoidance regimes (GAARs) in domestic legislation along with the analysis of those regimes is well documented with academic studies focusing on an examination of the introduction and subsequent interpretation and application of GAARs in jurisdictions such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa, the UK, China and India. However, a review of current literature reveals that different academics evaluate GAARs based on different sets of criteria. This results in an absence of a common theoretical framework with which to assess the effectiveness of existing and proposed GAARs. Further, it is arguably difficult to undertake a comparative analysis of GAARs as a lack of a common normative framework decreases the validity and robustness of a comparison of findings. The aim of the study discussed in this article is to develop a normative framework with which to assess GAARs by adopting a thematic analysis of relevant academic articles published since 2000. Thirty-eight academic articles were selected for this study with each article coded to ascertain common themes. This has allowed categories of quotations to be determined and a structured theoretical framework to be developed. The article concludes that the resulting framework highlights five principles relating to the structure and evaluation of GAARs: purposive and objective interpretation, a proactive stance, discretion, certainty, and ability to alter liability. Each of these principles is discussed and, in doing so, this article fills a gap in the current literature by developing a principled framework to help ensure that future studies evaluate GAARs from a single point of view. Finally, the article examines this principled framework in the context of ten GAARs in the Asia-Pacific region in order to see whether governments in that region adopt the factors which have been determined to be part of the framework for a model GAAR.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Tax Avoidance, General Anti-Avoidance Regimes|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY (150100) > Taxation Accounting (150107)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Schools > School of Accountancy
|Deposited On:||15 Jun 2016 00:44|
|Last Modified:||16 Jun 2016 23:55|
Repository Staff Only: item control page