How has the profile of Australian nurse practitioners changed over time?

Middleton, Sandy, Gardner, Anne, Della, Phillip R., Lam, Lawrence, Allnutt, Nissa, & Gardner, Glenn (2016) How has the profile of Australian nurse practitioners changed over time? Collegian, 23(1), pp. 69-77.

View at publisher

Abstract

Aim

  • To examine longitudinal changes in the profile of Australian nurse practitioners surveyed in both 2007 and 2009 ('resurveyed respondents') and to determine differences between nurse practitioners who completed the census only in 2009 ('new respondents') and resurveyed respondents. Background: The nurse practitioner role is integral to the development and sustainability of advanced practice roles in healthcare systems. However, its success depends upon support from policy makers, health services and nursing. A census of Australian nurse practitioners previously was conducted in 2007 to obtain national data on the role and scope of practice of nurse practitioners in Australia.

Design

  • A quantitative self-administered survey. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to all authorised Australian nurse practitioners in 2009.

Results/findings

  • A total of 408 surveys were administered with 293 questionnaires completed (response rate 76.3). Of these, 49 of participants also had completed the 2007 survey. There were no differences in the limitations and enablers identified in 2007 compared to 2009, indicating that perceived barriers had not been addressed over time, nor had there been substantial improvements. New respondents were more likely to have worked as a nurse practitioner in the previous week (p < 0.004). There was a significant increase in the number of nurse practitioners waiting on approval for some or all clinical protocols (p = 0.024).

Conclusions

  • Conditions enabling work to full scope of practice continue to be perceived as suboptimal by Australian nurse practitioners. Supportive strategies are needed to enable the role to be effectively utilised. © 2014 Australian College of Nursing Ltd.

Impact and interest:

1 citations in Scopus
1 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 96115
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Australia; clinical protocol; health care system; human; major clinical study; nurse practitioner; quantitative study; questionnaire; scope of practice
DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2014.10.004
ISSN: 1322-7696
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
Deposited On: 15 Jun 2016 04:05
Last Modified: 17 Jun 2016 01:41

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page