Forensic accounting: Professional regulation of a multi-disciplinary field
The regulatory environment in which accountants operate is reasonably complex. The field of forensic accounting, which is the focus of this article, elevates that complexity to a heightened level as practitioners in this field now regularly advise across a broad range of fraud, commercial disputes and analytics areas. Persons discharging these roles are drawn from the accounting and non-accounting professions and this multi-disciplinary composition and the implications that flow from this are at the heart of this study.
This article examines how the overlapping of diverse occupational jurisdictions influences the professionalisation process of forensic accounting practice in Australia and how self-interest and public interest considerations impact the pursuit of independent professional status. The article identifies the complexity of the forensic accounting role due to the overlapping of other occupational jurisdictions and the challenges this creates for professional accounting bodies in their attempts to regulate and govern forensic accounting practice.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||forensic accounting, regulation of forensic accounting, cross disciplinary regulation, accountability, goverance of forensic accounting|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Schools > School of Accountancy
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2016 Thomson Reuters|
|Deposited On:||05 Jul 2016 22:06|
|Last Modified:||18 Jul 2016 23:20|
Repository Staff Only: item control page