Development and validation of the Dietetic Confidence Scale for working with clients experiencing psychological issues
Buttenshaw, Kerryn, Ash, Susan, & Shakespeare-Finch, Jane (2016) Development and validation of the Dietetic Confidence Scale for working with clients experiencing psychological issues. Nutrition and Dietetics.
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
- A standardised tool was needed to measure a generalist dietitian’s confidence about working with clients experiencing psychological issues in order to effectively evaluate mental health-related professional development activities. The aim of this study was to develop, pilot and validate a robust instrument that measures a generalist dietitian’s professional confidence for working with clients experiencing psychological issues.
- The Dietetic Confidence Scale (DCS) was developed. Two cross-sectional samples of practicing dietitians (n = 185; 458) from various settings and locations were recruited. Study 1: principal components analysis (PCA) helped refine scale items and derive a model, which was then validated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA, Study 2). Cronbach’s alpha estimated scale reliability. Correlations assessed associations between factors.
- Study 1: A 13-item, two-factor solution accounted for 69.1% of the total variance. Total Cronbach’s α = 0.92. Dietetic confidence was associated with: (i) Confidence using the Nutrition Care Process and (ii) Confidence Advocating for Self care and Client care. Study 2: The CFA supported the proposed scale and model. A Good Fit Index of 0.95 indicated a strong fit. Item-factor correlations ranged from r = 0.50 to 0.91. The final scale showed good reliability (α = 0.93).
- This is the first self-efficacy scale for dietetic practitioners subjected to PCA and CFA using two independent samples. The DCS is a psychometrically robust instrument with strong internal consistency. It can be used to measure dietetic confidence about working with clients experiencing psychological issues and to highlight areas where additional support or training may be needed. Further validity and reliability testing is needed to enhance scale generalisability and use.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||depression; dietitians; factor analysis; mental health; professional development; self-efficacy|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NUTRITION AND DIETETICS (111100)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences
Current > Schools > School of Psychology & Counselling
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2016 Dietitians Association of Australia|
|Deposited On:||25 Jul 2016 22:59|
|Last Modified:||08 Aug 2016 03:15|
Repository Staff Only: item control page