Views and practices of Australian optometrists regarding driving for patients with central visual impairment

Oberstein, Sharon L, Boon, Mei Ying, Chu, Byoung Sun, & Wood, Joanne M (2016) Views and practices of Australian optometrists regarding driving for patients with central visual impairment. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 99(5), pp. 476-483. (In Press)

View at publisher

Abstract

Background:

Eye-care practitioners are often required to make recommendations regarding their patients' visual fitness for driving, including patients with visual impairment. This study aimed to understand the perspectives and management strategies adopted by optometrists regarding driving for their patients with central visual impairment.

Method:

Optometrists were invited to participate in an online survey (from April to June 2012). Items were designed to explore the views and practices adopted by optometrists regarding driving for patients with central visual impairment (visual acuity [VA] poorer than 6/12, normal visual fields, cognitive and physical health), including conditional driver's licences and bioptic telescopes. Closed- and open-ended questions were used.

Results:

The response rate was 14 per cent (n = 300 valid responses were received). Most respondents (83 per cent) reported that they advised their patients with visual impairment to ‘always’ or ‘sometimes’ stop driving. Most were confident in interpreting the visual licensing standards (78 per cent) and advising on legal responsibilities concerning driving (99 per cent). Respondents were familiar with VA requirements for unconditional licensing (98 per cent); however, the median response VA of 6/15 as the poorest VA suggested for conditional licences differed from international practice and Australian medical guidelines released a month prior to the survey's launch. Few respondents reported prescribing bioptic telescopes (two per cent). While 97 per cent of respondents stated that they discussed conditional licences with their patients with visual impairment, relatively few (28 per cent) reported having completed conditional licence applications for such individuals in the previous year. Those who had completed applications were more experienced in years of practice (p = 0.02) and spent more time practising in rural locations (p = 0.03) than those who had not.

Conclusion:

The majority of Australian optometrists were receptive to the possibilities of driving options for individuals with central visual impairment, although management approaches varied with respect to conditional licensing.

Impact and interest:

1 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 99703
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: bioptic telescopic spectacles, conditional driver’slicence, driving, lowvision
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12398
ISSN: 0816-4622
Divisions: Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2016 Optometry in Australia
Deposited On: 05 Oct 2016 23:05
Last Modified: 06 Oct 2016 21:41

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page