Legal responses to human-wildlife conflict: The precautionary principle, risk analysis and the ‘lethal management’ of endangered species
Hamman, Evan, Woolaston, Katie, & Lewis, Bridget (2016) Legal responses to human-wildlife conflict: The precautionary principle, risk analysis and the ‘lethal management’ of endangered species. IUCN Academy of Environmental Law, 7, pp. 57-83.
Sharks can kill, wolves and bears can maim, and bats and birds can spread disease. Human existence has a long history of such conflicts. But as our populations and activities expand, human-wildlife encounters are an increasingly common source of tension. Some species pose a risk to humans, including through the spread of disease, but may also be endangered or at risk of extinction themselves. In such cases, there is a duty to conserve (nature), but also to protect (the public). Deciding how to respond requires decision-makers to make difficult but important value judgments. This article searches for ways to improve the legal processes for managing these unique situations of human-wildlife conflict. It investigates whether principles of international environmental law and human rights can be part of the solution, and if so, to what extent. The analysis concludes that one of the foremost roles for law is to prescribe processes for decision-makers which are rational, balanced and transparent. Existing principles like the precautionary principle are relevant, but they are only part of a broader risk analysis which must also account for human rights, communities and cultural values.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Precautionary Principle, Threatened Species, Environmental Law, Human Wildlife Conflict, Endangered Species, White Shark, Great White Shark|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||2016 Evan Hamman, Katie Woolastin and Bridget Lewis|
|Deposited On:||12 Oct 2016 23:02|
|Last Modified:||13 Oct 2016 23:07|
Repository Staff Only: item control page