Automatic segmentation of retinal and choroidal thickness in OCT images using convolutional neural networks

, , , , & (2018) Automatic segmentation of retinal and choroidal thickness in OCT images using convolutional neural networks. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 2018), 2018-04-29 - 2018-05-03.

[img]
Preview
PDF (753kB)
Final__d23158-1-dacarvo2018cnnsegmentationfinal.pdf.

Description

Purpose To evaluate the performance of a fully automatic method based on a deep learning approach to segment retinal and choroidal boundaries in OCT images, and derive retinal thickness (RT) and choroidal thickness (ChT) using data obtained from a healthy pediatric cohort. Methods Custom designed convolutional neural networks (CNN) were trained to classify three boundaries; the inner limiting membrane (ILM), the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the chorio-scleral interface (CSI). The CNN uses a rectangular path size of 61x31 (VxH) pixels to train the network and three network-input options were tested during training; (i) standard intensity, (ii) attenuation coefficient equivalent and (iii) a combination of both (dual). For each option, the network was trained on the same 137 randomly selected images (70 subjects) and validated on 28 images to ensure adequate training. The network was then tested on 30 different images from 30 different subjects. To test repeatability, consecutive images from the same subject/location were used. The CNN outputs a probability map for each boundary position that was traced with a graph-search technique. The results from the automatic method were compared to data from manual segmentation by an experienced observer. Results The well-defined ILM and RPE boundaries showed small errors (1 pixel) in comparison to the CSI which exhibited slightly larger errors (4 pixels) across all tested options (Table 1). The different CNN inputs had a small effect on the boundary error, with the dual input yielding a slightly smaller mean error and SD. Analysis of the ChT and RT, revealed errors of -0.1 and -2 pixels respectively. The mean repeatability difference results (in pixels) for the RT [1.10;1.09;1.08] and ChT [3.40;3.43;3.38] across all options were comparable with the repeatability from manual segmentation [RT 1.24,ChT 2.51]. Conclusions The automatic and manual segmentation methods showed very close agreement, which suggests that the proposed method provides robust detection of the retinal and choroidal boundaries of interest.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

153 since deposited on 25 May 2018
8 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 118488
Item Type: Contribution to conference (Poster)
Refereed: No
ORCID iD:
Alonso-Caneiro, Davidorcid.org/0000-0002-7754-6592
Read, Scott A.orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-673X
Vincent, Stephen J.orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-1320
Collins, Michael J.orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-5498
Keywords: Automated segmentation, Choroidal thickness, Manual segmentation, OCT images, Retinal thickness
Pure ID: 57312145
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Optometry & Vision Science
Copyright Owner: 2018 The Author(s)
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 25 May 2018 01:24
Last Modified: 01 Mar 2024 23:10