Which oil shocks really matter in equity markets?

, , & (2019) Which oil shocks really matter in equity markets? Energy Economics, 81, pp. 134-141.

[img]
Preview
Accepted Version (PDF 1MB)
Which oil shocks really matter in equity markets.pdf.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

View at publisher

Description

This paper examines the relationship between structural oil shocks and US equity markets. The recent oil shock decomposition of Ready (2018) is reconsidered and refined, providing a clearer delineation between shocks to equity market discount rates and aggregate demand, leading to an oil shock specification which attributes substantially more explanatory power to the latter in explaining equity market variation. Providing links with the literature dating back to Kilian and Park (2009), an explicit role is given to precautionary demand shocks using an independent measure constructed from oil futures data, reducing the role of the supply shocks obtained as the final residual in the recursive identification scheme. In an extended sample that allows an analysis of the oil/equity market relationship since the global financial crisis, the modified aggregate demand shocks have approximately twice as much explanatory power for stock return variation than the demand shocks of Ready (2018). The importance of these shocks in driving oil price changes and equity market volatility has only increased since the financial crisis, with the role of supply shocks diminishing. Once these demand effects are accounted for, there is little relationship between precautionary demand shocks and equity returns, in contrast to the existing literature.

Impact and interest:

34 citations in Scopus
23 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

158 since deposited on 09 Apr 2019
26 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 128372
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Clements, Adamorcid.org/0000-0002-4232-0323
Thiele, Stephenorcid.org/0000-0002-5529-2210
Measurements or Duration: 8 pages
Keywords: Precautionary demand, Stock markets, Supply and demand shocks, Volatility
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.026
ISSN: 0140-9883
Pure ID: 40806962
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Schools > School of Economics & Finance
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 09 Apr 2019 04:32
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2024 02:24