Occupational radiation exposure to the head is higher for scrub nurses than cardiologists during cardiac angiography

, Hartel, Gunter, & (2019) Occupational radiation exposure to the head is higher for scrub nurses than cardiologists during cardiac angiography. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(11), pp. 2692-2700.

[img]
Preview
Accepted Version (PDF 530kB)
jan.14085.pdf.

View at publisher

Description

Aims: This study aimed to compare the head dose of a cardiologist to scrub and scout nurses during cardiac angiography. 

Design: A correlational longitudinal quantitative design was used to examine the relationship between the variable of occupational dose to the medical operator when compared with the dose to the scrub and scout nurses. 

Methods: A quantitative analysis was performed on data collected during coronary angiograms (N = 612) for one cardiologist and 22 nurses performing either the scrub or scout role between May 2015 and February 2017. Analysis was based on log-transformed dose levels and reported as geometric means and associated 95% confidence intervals. 

Results: It was found that scrub nurses received on average 41% more head dose than the cardiologist during diagnostic procedures and 52% higher doses during interventional cases. Conclusion: Nurses working in fluoroscopic cardiovascular procedures should be provided with appropriate training and protective equipment, notably lead skull caps, to minimize their occupational radiation exposure. Impact: There is a notable lack of research evaluating the occupational head and eye exposure to nurses involved in fluoroscopic procedures. This study found that during diagnostic coronary angiograms, the scrub nurses received 41% more occupational head dose than the cardiologist and 52% higher head doses during interventional cases. Radial access resulted in higher doses to scrub nurses than femoral artery access. It is advisable that staff wear protective lead glasses and skull caps and use appropriately positioned ceiling mounted lead shields to minimize the risk of adverse effects of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation.

Impact and interest:

12 citations in Scopus
13 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

312 since deposited on 02 Jun 2019
49 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 129879
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Fontanarosa, Davideorcid.org/0000-0001-6986-3718
Additional Information: 2020 SAGE HDR Student Publication Prize Commendation (Faculty of Science & Engineering)
Measurements or Duration: 9 pages
Keywords: dose optimization, eye dose, fluoroscopy, ionizing radiation, nursing dose, occupational dose, personal shielding, radioprotection, scrub nurse, X-ray
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14085
ISSN: 1365-2648
Pure ID: 40811664
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Clinical Sciences
Funding Information: Funding information The lead author received 15,000 AUD by the Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation (Innovation Grant Award, 2015). There is no specific grant number pertaining to this award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank our nursing, radiography and medical colleagues from the cardio-vascular suites at Greenslopes Private Hospital for their contributions towards data collection during the course of this research.
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 02 Jun 2019 23:29
Last Modified: 31 Aug 2025 17:19