Academic-industry integration in health: enhancing postgraduate professional learning (Final Report: 2019)

, McCarthy, Alexandra, Henderson, Amanda, , Shaban, Ramon, , & Thomson, Bernadette (2019) Academic-industry integration in health: enhancing postgraduate professional learning (Final Report: 2019). Australian Government Department of Education and Training, Australia.

View at publisher

Description

Executive summary Nursing, paramedicine and allied health are significant players in clinical–academic settings, at the postgraduate level. Health systems depend on specialised disciplinary contribution and high-functioning, team-based approaches to patient care. In health contexts, the aim of postgraduate professional learning is to enable a clinically-educated and research-literate workforce to translate evidence into practice within regulatory frameworks and organisational expectations (Dzau et al., 2013). Billett’s Australian Learning and Teaching Council Fellowship work emphasises that, when it is well-designed and delivered, work- integrated education contributes enormously to students’ professional learning (Billett, 2007). Professional learning in this respect relies on the development of capabilities through teaching and learning experiences that integrate academic, discipline-specific and industry- referenced knowledge, skills and attitudes (Papadopoulos et al., 2011). Health services and faculties invest significant resources into their respective postgraduate curricula. These curricula range from practical to intensely theoretical, and from short professional development modules to Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF)-compliant units and programs. This current approach often results in duplication of both curricula and resource investment in the health and higher education sectors (Dzau et al., 2013). This project recognised that, although industry and universities bring complementary knowledge and skills to curriculum development, each is driven by different organisational imperatives, resulting in divergent goals and approaches for curricula and different metrics to capture educational outputs (Dzau et al., 2013). In developing the shared culture of curriculum development advocated in this project, the universities and health services that deliver postgraduate education worked in a co-design partnership, striving for relevance, efficiency and agility to develop a mutually agreed framework for professional learning. Aims The aims of this project were to (1) develop an industry–academic postgraduate education framework that integrated the imperatives of higher education and the health industry while maximising postgraduate students’ professional learning; (2) develop, using this framework mutually agreed curriculum content, teaching and assessment strategies to meet the needs of students, industry and higher education in the postgraduate specialty of emergency nursing; and (3) disseminate the project outcomes to key academic, industry stakeholders and other potential adopters through a national conference presentation and publication in high-impact journals. Project approach The project was conducted in two phases. In phase 1, three one-day workshops were undertaken with key clinical–academic stakeholders (e.g. representatives of specialty study areas, the Office of the Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer (Queensland), partner university learning and teaching units, professional organisations, past and present students) to explore the principles and processes relevant to the draft framework. Phase 2 contextualised the outcomes and finalised project deliverables.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

128 since deposited on 13 Jun 2019
22 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 130736
Item Type: Book/Report (Commissioned Report)
ORCID iD:
Theobald, Karenorcid.org/0000-0002-2880-1411
Coyer, Fionaorcid.org/0000-0002-8467-0081
Measurements or Duration: 0 pages
ISBN: 978-1-76051-682-6
Pure ID: 33417017
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
Copyright Owner: 2019 the Author(s)
Copyright Statement: With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and where otherwise noted, all material presented in this document is provided under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License creativecommons/4.0/license. The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided) as is the full legal code for the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License creativecommons/4.0/legalcode.
Deposited On: 13 Jun 2019 00:37
Last Modified: 02 Mar 2024 04:23