Blockchain and the law

(2016) Blockchain and the law. Internet Law Bulletin, 19(1), pp. 250-254, 2016. [Article]

[img] MS Word 2007 (46kB)
__qut.edu.au_Documents_StudentHome_group01$_n10356401_Desktop_Blockchain and the Law clean.docx.
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
[img]
Preview
Accepted Version (PDF 60kB)

Description

• Blockchain technology, or shared-ledger technology, is increasingly seen as an infrastructure-level technology that can be employed in non-financial applications, such as programmable smart contracts that self-execute, digital notary services, and platforms that track and transfer digital media assets. • Emergent non-financial applications of blockchain technology will broaden the impact of the blockchain beyond banks and other financial institutions to other forms of asset ownership transfer, such as developers who may purchase land from a blockchain land title registry; trade mark and patent holders who may exercise their intellectual property rights over the blockchain; and clients who may be a party to a smart contract. • Knowledge-sharing opportunities need to be in place to ensure that developers and lawyers understand each other's perspectives. • Lawyers should be aware of the potential of blockchain technology to augment their capabilities as well as disrupt their clients. • As smart contracts are increasingly used, lawyers may need to gain a basic proficiency in coding to allow them to check that clauses and contractual mechanisms have been appropriately translated to the relevant programming language. This could be met by training as part of continuing professional development obligations or the legal industry could partner with blockchain stakeholders to produce guides and programmable standard smart contracts that could be tailored to a client's needs.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

268 since deposited on 16 Jul 2019
27 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 131441
Item Type: Contribution to Newspaper, Magazine or Website (Article)
Refereed: No
Additional Information: Newsletter - not refereed
Measurements or Duration: 5 pages
Keywords: bitcoin, blockchain, cryptocurrency, eContract, ethereum, regulation, smart contract, trust
ISSN: 1329-9735
Pure ID: 34570585
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Law
Past > Institutes > Institute for Future Environments
Current > Schools > School of Law
?? dmrc ??
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 16 Jul 2019 23:48
Last Modified: 26 Jul 2024 04:48