Exploring the justifications for selecting a drop landing task to assess injury biomechanics: A narrative review and analysis of landings performed by female netball players

Collings, Tyler J., , Stuelcken, Max C., Mellifont, Daniel B., & Sayers, Mark G.L. (2019) Exploring the justifications for selecting a drop landing task to assess injury biomechanics: A narrative review and analysis of landings performed by female netball players. Sports Medicine, 49(3), pp. 385-395.

View at publisher

Description

When assessing biomechanics in a laboratory setting, task selection is critical to the production of accurate and meaningful data. The injury biomechanics of landing is commonly investigated in a laboratory setting using a drop landing task. However, why this task is so frequently chosen is unclear. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to (1) identify the justification/s provided within the published literature as to why a drop landing task was selected to investigate the injury biomechanics of landing in sport and (2) use current research evidence, supplemented by a new set of biomechanical data, to evaluate whether the justifications are supported. To achieve this, a comprehensive literature search using Scopus, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus online databases was conducted for studies that had collected biomechanical data relating to sport injuries using a drop landing task. In addition, kinematic and kinetic data were collected from female netball players during drop landings and maximum-effort countermovement jumps from the ground to grab a suspended ball. The literature search returned a total of 149 articles that were reviewed to determine the justification for selecting a drop landing task. Of these, 54% provided no explicit justification to explain why a drop landing task was chosen, and 15% stated it was selected because it had been used in previous research. Other reasons included that the drop landing provides high experimental control (16%), is a functional sports task (11%), and is a dynamic task (6%). Evidence in the literature suggests that the biomechanical data produced with drop landings may not be as externally valid as more sport-specific tasks. Biomechanical data showed that the drop landing may not control center of mass fall height any better than maximum-effort countermovement jumps from the ground. Further, the frequently used step-off technique to initiate drop landings resulted in kinematic and kinetic asymmetries between lower limbs, which would otherwise be symmetrical when performing a countermovement jump from the ground. Researchers should consider the limitations of a drop landing task and endeavor to improve the laboratory tasks used to collect biomechanical data to examine the injury biomechanics of landing.

Impact and interest:

22 citations in Scopus
19 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 136673
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Review article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Gorman, Adam D.orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-7268
Measurements or Duration: 11 pages
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-01045-x
ISSN: 0112-1642
Pure ID: 43017524
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Funding Information: Funding The authors acknowledge the funding provided by the Sport Performance Innovation and Knowledge Excellence unit at the Queensland Academy of Sport. The funding party had no input into the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or writing of the manuscript.
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 29 Jan 2020 04:58
Last Modified: 03 Apr 2024 09:49