Endometriosis and fertility: women's accounts of healthcare

, Fisher, J., & Kirkman, M. (2016) Endometriosis and fertility: women's accounts of healthcare. Human Reproduction, 31(3), pp. 554-562.

Free-to-read version at publisher website

Description

STUDY QUESTION
What do women with endometriosis recall being told about their fertility by their healthcare providers?

SUMMARY ANSWER
Women recalled being given varied information and advice, and gave examples of empathic and individualized care from doctors but also reported opportunities for enhancing clinical practice.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
There is evidence of an association between endometriosis and infertility. However, the strength of this association and the mechanisms that underlie it are not yet known nor are the implications for optimum healthcare.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This study used in-depth cross-sectional qualitative research methods.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Women aged at least 18 years who lived in Victoria, Australia, and who had been surgically diagnosed with endometriosis were invited to participate in in-depth interviews about their experience of endometriosis. Twenty-six women of diverse backgrounds and experiences of endometriosis were interviewed from January to September 2014. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically using a data-driven approach.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
All women encountered medical professionals who were aware of the association between endometriosis and infertility, and who were proactive in ensuring fertility was addressed within endometriosis care. Women recalled being given varied, often conflicting, information about the consequences for their fertility of an endometriosis diagnosis. While some recounted positive experiences with the way their doctor communicated with them about endometriosis and fertility, all women reported adverse experiences such as receiving insufficient or inappropriate information or having their doctor prioritize their fertility over other aspects of their care, including quality of life and symptom relief, without first consulting them.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
The perspectives of the women's doctors were not sought. The findings may not translate to settings that differ from a predominantly Anglo-Saxon country with both universal public and private healthcare systems.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Women's fertility needs and priorities differ for many reasons; there can be no ‘one size fits all’ approach to care. Women may benefit most from endometriosis care in which they are first asked about their fertility needs and preferences and in which medical uncertainty is acknowledged.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
K.Y. receives a scholarship from the National Health and Medical Research Council and Australian Rotary Health. J.F. is supported by a Monash Professional Fellowship and the Jean Hailes Professional Fellowship which is funded by Perpetual Trustees Pty Ltd. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact and interest:

42 citations in Scopus
32 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 197439
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Young, K.orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-3727
Measurements or Duration: 9 pages
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev337
ISSN: 0268-1161
Pure ID: 42954666
Copyright Owner: The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 10 Mar 2020 05:32
Last Modified: 29 Mar 2024 11:31