Professions and expertise: How machine learning and blockchain are redesigning the landscape of professional knowledge and organization

Flood, John & (2019) Professions and expertise: How machine learning and blockchain are redesigning the landscape of professional knowledge and organization. University of Miami Law Review, 73(2), pp. 443-482.

Free-to-read version at publisher website

Description

Machine learning has entered the world of the professions with differential impacts. Automation will have huge impacts on the nature of work and society. Engineering, architecture, and medicine are early and enthusiastic adopters of automation. Other professions, especially law, are late and, in some cases, reluctant adopters. This Article examines the effects of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and Blockchain on professions and their knowledge bases. We start by examining the nature of expertise in general and the function of expertise in law. Using examples from law, such as Gulati and Scott’s analysis of how lawyers create (or don’t create) legal agreements, we show that even non-routine and complex legal work is potentially susceptible to automation. However, professions are different from other occupational groups because they include both indeterminate and technical elements that make pure automation difficult to achieve. We consider the future prospects of AI and Blockchain on professions and hypothesize that as the technologies mature, they will incorporate more human work through neural networks and Blockchain applications, such as the distributed autonomous organization (“DAO”). We argue that in the law and the legal profession, the role of lawyer as trusted advisor will again emerge as the central point of value.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 200657
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Robb, Lachlanorcid.org/0000-0002-1195-9407
Measurements or Duration: 40 pages
Keywords: Blockchain, Professions, law
ISSN: 0041-9818
Pure ID: 58494629
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 02 Jun 2020 23:44
Last Modified: 01 Mar 2024 20:49