When plans are used to no effect: Considering implementation performance of greater Brisbane's compact activity centre policies
|
Accepted Version
(PDF 417kB)
67456342. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. |
Description
Evaluations of plan implementation are typically conceived in terms of plan conformance (the degree to which outcomes align with planning intent) or plan performance (the degree to which decision makers apply the plan). In this research, we consider the relationship between performance–conformance by evaluating the implementation of compact activity centre policy in greater Brisbane. We examine two decades of changes to local land use planning regulations using content analysis, quantifications of permitted development intensity, and comparisons of actual land use changes with planned intent, to identify evidence of the use of metropolitan scale activity centre policy. We find that the activity centre policy performed well and was used as intended across the metropolitan area. However, despite strong performance, the policy conformed poorly in terms of achieving the expected outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of understanding plan implementation from both performance and conformance perspectives. While conformance evaluations are essential to connect planning intent to physical outcomes, understanding plan performance is also necessary to explain the results of conformance evaluations and whether conformance successes or failures were due to deficiencies with the plan itself or how the plan was used by key actors charged with its implementation.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
ID Code: | 203670 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||||
ORCID iD: |
|
||||||
Measurements or Duration: | 16 pages | ||||||
Keywords: | Activity centres, compact city, plan evaluation, plan performance, land use planning | ||||||
DOI: | 10.1177/2399808320951583 | ||||||
ISSN: | 0265-8135 | ||||||
Pure ID: | 67456342 | ||||||
Divisions: | Past > Institutes > Institute for Future Environments Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Engineering Current > Schools > School of Architecture & Built Environment Current > Research Centres > Centre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities |
||||||
Copyright Owner: | The Author(s) 2020 | ||||||
Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au | ||||||
Deposited On: | 31 Aug 2020 00:54 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 08 Jul 2024 17:09 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page