Endotracheal suction interventions in mechanically ventilated children: An integrative review to inform evidence-based practice

Schults, Jessica A., Mitchell, Marion L., Cooke, Marie, , Ferguson, Alexandra, & Morrow, Brenda (2021) Endotracheal suction interventions in mechanically ventilated children: An integrative review to inform evidence-based practice. Australian Critical Care, 34(1), pp. 92-102.

View at publisher

Description

Objective: The objective of this study was to review and critically appraise the evidence for paediatric endotracheal suction interventions.

Data sources: A systematic search for studies was undertaken in the electronic databases CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL from 2003.

Study selection: Included studies assessed suction interventions in children (≤18 ys old) receiving mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was defined a priori as duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and measures of gas exchange and lung mechanics.

Data extraction: Data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Study methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool for randomised trials or the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Overall assessment of the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria.

Results: Overall 17 studies involving 1618 children and more than 21,834 suction episodes were included in the review. The most common intervention theme was suction system (five studies; 29%). All included trials were at unclear or high risk of performance bias due to the inability to blind interventionists. Current evidence suggests that closed suction may maintain arterial saturations, normal saline leads to significant transient desaturation, and lung recruitment applied after suction offers short-term oxygenation benefit.

Limitations: Lack of randomised controlled trials, inconsistencies in populations and interventions across studies, and imprecision and risk of bias in included studies precluded data pooling to provide an estimate of interventions effect.

Conclusions: Based on the results of this integrative review, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to guide practice around suction interventions in mechanically ventilated children.

Impact and interest:

10 citations in Scopus
9 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 204357
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Review article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Long, Debbie A.orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-9559
Measurements or Duration: 11 pages
Keywords: Adverse events, Endotracheal suction, Intensive care, Paediatric, Systematic review
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.05.003
ISSN: 1036-7314
Pure ID: 67751085
Funding Information: Dr. Schults' institution received funding from Centaur Memorial Fund for Nurses and Children's Health Queensland , SERTA committee. Dr. Morrow's institution received funding from National Research Foundation , and she received funding from the University of Cape Town and Imperial College Press . The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Copyright Owner: Crown copyright 2020
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 15 Sep 2020 04:29
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2024 22:32