Transitions in decision-making authority at the end of life: a problem of law, ethics and practice in deceased donation

& Martin, Dominique E (2022) Transitions in decision-making authority at the end of life: a problem of law, ethics and practice in deceased donation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(2), pp. 112-117.

View at publisher

Description

Where a person is unable to make medical decisions for themselves, law and practice allows others to make decisions on their behalf. This is common at the end of a person's life where decision-making capacity is often lost. A further, and separate, decision that is often considered at the time of death (and often preceding death) is whether the person wanted to act as an organ or tissue donor. However, in some jurisdictions, the lawful decision-maker for the donation decision (the a € donation decision-maker') is different from the person who was granted decision-making authority for medical decisions during the person's life. To date, little attention has been given in the literature to the ethical concerns and practical problems that arise where this shift in legal authority occurs. Such a change in decision-making authority is particularly problematic where premortem measures are suggested to maximise the chances of a successful organ donation. This paper examines this shift in decision-making authority and discusses the legal, ethical and practical implications of such frameworks.

Impact and interest:

6 citations in Scopus
6 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

381 since deposited on 07 Dec 2020
78 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 206866
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
Measurements or Duration: 6 pages
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106572
ISSN: 0306-6800
Pure ID: 73171078
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Business & Law
Current > Schools > School of Law
Copyright Owner: Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 07 Dec 2020 05:12
Last Modified: 16 Sep 2025 23:20