Comparative analysis delineates the transcriptional resistance mechanisms for pod borer resistance in the pigeonpea wild relative cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) thouars

, , Oduor, Richard O., Kago, Leah, , , , & Ghimire, Sita R. (2021) Comparative analysis delineates the transcriptional resistance mechanisms for pod borer resistance in the pigeonpea wild relative cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) thouars. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(1), Article number: 309.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 1MB)
74290255.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Open access copy at publisher website

Description

Insect pests pose a serious threat to global food production. Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)) is one of the most destructive pests of leguminous crops. The use of host resistance has been an effective, environmentally friendly and sustainable approach for controlling several
agricultural pests. The exploitation of natural variations in crop wild relatives could yield pestresistant crop varieties. In this study, we used a high-throughput transcriptome profiling approach to investigate the defense mechanisms of susceptible cultivated and tolerant wild pigeonpea genotypes against H. armigera infestation. The wild genotype displayed elevated pest-induced gene expression, including the enhanced induction of phytohormone and calcium/calmodulin signaling, transcription factors, plant volatiles and secondary metabolite genes compared to the cultivated control. The biosynthetic and regulatory processes associated with flavonoids, terpenes and glucosinolate
secondary metabolites showed higher accumulations in the wild genotype, suggesting the existence of distinct tolerance mechanisms. This study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying insect resistance in the wild pigeonpea genotype. This information highlights the indispensable role of crop wild relatives as a source of crucial genetic resources that could be important in devising strategies for crop improvement with enhanced pest resistance.

Impact and interest:

10 citations in Scopus
9 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

151 since deposited on 06 Jan 2021
19 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 207203
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Njaci, Isaacorcid.org/0000-0001-9649-6650
Williams, Brettorcid.org/0000-0002-6510-8843
Hoang, Linh Thi Myorcid.org/0000-0002-1700-197X
Additional Information: Funding Information: Funding: This work was supported by the Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) program through the BecA-ILRI Hub. The ABCF Program was funded by the Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) through the BecA-CSIRO partnership; the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA); the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); the UK Department for International Development (DFID); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Advance Queensland Research Fellowship package grant numbers AQRF14816-17RD2, AQRF04016-17RD2 and AQRF14716-17RD2. I.N. was an ABCF Fellowship recipient and A.N.-D. was a QUT-HDR Sponsorship and Associated Grain scholarship recipient. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) program through the BecA-ILRI Hub. The ABCF Program was funded by the Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) through the BecA-CSIRO partnership; the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA); the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); the UK Department for International Development (DFID); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Advance Queensland Research Fellowship package grant numbers AQRF14816-17RD2, AQRF04016-17RD2 and AQRF14716-17RD2. I.N. was an ABCF Fellowship recipient and A.N.-D. was a QUT-HDR Sponsorship and Associated Grain scholarship recipient. The authors wish to acknowledge ILRI Forage Genebank, the Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) and the Katumani and Australian Grains Genebank (AGG) for the provision of wild and cultivated pigeonpea seeds. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Measurements or Duration: 16 pages
Keywords: Cajanus scarabaeoides, Crop wild relatives, Helicoverpa armigera, Insect resistance, Pigeonpea, Pod borer, Tran-scriptomics
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010309
ISSN: 1422-0067
Pure ID: 74290255
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Science
Current > Schools > School of Biology & Environmental Science
Funding Information: Funding: This work was supported by the Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) program through the BecA-ILRI Hub. The ABCF Program was funded by the Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) through the BecA-CSIRO partnership; the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA); the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); the UK Department for International Development (DFID); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Advance Queensland Research Fellowship package grant numbers AQRF14816-17RD2, AQRF04016-17RD2 and AQRF14716-17RD2. I.N. was an ABCF Fellowship recipient and A.N.-D. was a QUT-HDR Sponsorship and Associated Grain scholarship recipient. This work was supported by the Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) program through the BecA-ILRI Hub. The ABCF Program was funded by the Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) through the BecA-CSIRO partnership; the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA); the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); the UK Department for International Development (DFID); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) and the Advance Queensland Research Fellowship package grant numbers AQRF14816-17RD2, AQRF04016-17RD2 and AQRF14716-17RD2. I.N. was an ABCF Fellowship recipient and A.N.-D. was a QUT-HDR Sponsorship and Associated Grain scholarship recipient. The authors wish to acknowledge ILRI Forage Genebank, the Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) and the Katumani and Australian Grains Genebank (AGG) for the provision of wild and cultivated pigeonpea seeds.
Copyright Owner: 2020 The Author(s)
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 06 Jan 2021 01:20
Last Modified: 08 Mar 2024 07:26