Device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: An Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study

, , , Palmer, Jennifer, Parke, Rachael L., Hammond, Naomi E., Knowles, Serena, , & other, and (2021) Device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: An Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study. Australian Critical Care, 34(6), pp. 561-568.

View at publisher

Description

<p>Background: Device-related pressure injuries (DRPIs) are an ongoing iatrogenic problem evident in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Critically ill patients are at high risk of developing pressure injuries caused by devices. Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of DRPI in critically ill patients in intensive care and the location, stage, and attributable device of DRPI and describe the products and processes of care used to prevent these injuries. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional point prevalence study of patients aged more than 16 years in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. The study was part of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Point Prevalence Program coordinated by The George Institute for Global Health. Main outcome measure: Identification of DRPI on the study day was the main outcome measure. Results: Of the 624 patients included from 44 participating ICUs, 27 were found to have 35 identified DRPIs, giving a point prevalence DRPI rate of 4.3% (27/624). Study patients had a mean age of 59 years, and 60.3% were men. Patients with DRPI compared with patients without DRPI were significantly heavier (median: 92 kg versus 80 kg, respectively, p = 0.027), were less likely to survive the ICU (63.0% versus 85.9%, respectively, p = 0.015), had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores at admission to the ICU (median: 20 versus 16, respectively, p = 0.001), received mechanical ventilation more often (88.9% versus 43.5%, respectively, p < 0.001), and were more frequently diagnosed with respiratory conditions (37.0% versus 18.6%, respectively, p = 0.022). Processes of care activities were surveyed in 42 ICUs. Most DRPIs were attributed to endotracheal tubes and other respiratory devices. Forty-two ICUs reported processes of care to prevent DRPI, and just more than half of the participating sites (54.8%, 23/44) reported a dedicated ICU-based protocol for prevention of DRPI. Conclusion: DRPIs pose a burden on patients in the ICU. Our study showed a DRPI prevalence comparable with other studies. Prevention strategies targeting DRPI should be included in ICU-specific pressure injury prevention guidelines or protocols.</p>

Impact and interest:

12 citations in Scopus
6 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 210563
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Coyer, Fionaorcid.org/0000-0002-8467-0081
Campbell, Jillorcid.org/0000-0002-1253-8831
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors thank all the contributing sites (supplemental file 1), the research nurses, and research coordinators at these sites, The George Institute for Global Health and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Point Prevalence Program.
Measurements or Duration: 8 pages
Keywords: Adult intensive care, Device-related pressure injury, Point prevalence, Pressure injury
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.12.011
ISSN: 1036-7314
Pure ID: 84909692
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Healthcare Transformation
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
Funding Information: The authors thank all the contributing sites (supplemental file 1), the research nurses, and research coordinators at these sites, The George Institute for Global Health and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Point Prevalence Program.
Copyright Owner: 2021 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd.
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 25 May 2021 04:26
Last Modified: 02 Aug 2024 18:44