Futility and the law: Knowledge, practice and attitudes of doctors in end of life care

, , , Gallois, Cindy, Parker, Malcolm, , Winch, Sarah, Callaway, Leonie, & (2016) Futility and the law: Knowledge, practice and attitudes of doctors in end of life care. QUT Law Review, 16(1), pp. 54-75.

[img]
Preview
Published Version (PDF 568kB)
33038529.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

View at publisher

Description

Despite the potential harm to patients (and others) and the financial cost of providing futile treatment at the end of life, this practice occurs. This article reports on empirical research undertaken in Queensland that explores doctors’ perceptions about the law that governs futile treatment at the end of life, and the role it plays in medical practice. The findings reveal that doctors have poor knowledge of their legal obligations and powers when making decisions about withholding or withdrawing futile treatment at the end of life; their attitudes towards the law were largely negative; and the law affected their clinical practice and had or would cause them to provide futile treatment.

Impact and interest:

7 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

94 since deposited on 06 Nov 2021
12 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 221098
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Willmott, Lindyorcid.org/0000-0002-9750-287X
White, Benorcid.org/0000-0003-3365-939X
Close, Elianaorcid.org/0000-0002-7359-3375
Graves, Nicholasorcid.org/0000-0002-5559-3267
Measurements or Duration: 22 pages
DOI: 10.5204/qutlr.v16i1.622
ISSN: 2201-7275
Pure ID: 33038529
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Law
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Law
Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Funding:
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2016 The Authors
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 06 Nov 2021 14:59
Last Modified: 01 Mar 2024 20:20