Severity scores in emergency department patients with presumed infection: A prospective validation study

Williams, Julian, , Chu, Kevin, Brown, Anthony, & (2016) Severity scores in emergency department patients with presumed infection: A prospective validation study. Critical Care Medicine, 44(3), pp. 539-547.

View at publisher

Description

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to 1) validate a number of severity of illness scores in a large cohort of emergency department patients admitted with presumed infection and 2) compare the performance of scores in patient subgroups with increasing mortality: infection without systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: Adult emergency department in a metropolitan tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. Patients: Emergency department patients admitted with presumed infection. Interventions: None. Methods: Consecutive emergency department patients admitted with presumed infection were identified over 160 weeks in two periods between 2007 and 2011. Clinical and laboratory data sufficient to calculate Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and the Severe Sepsis Score were entered into a database. Model discrimination was quantified using area under the receiver operating curve. Calibration was assessed using visual plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, and linear regressions of observed and predicted values. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 8,871 patients were enrolled with 30-day mortality of 3.7%. Area under the receiver operating curve values for the entire cohort were: Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score of 0.92, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of 0.90, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 0.86, and Severe Sepsis Score of 0.82. Discrimination decreased in subgroups with greater mortality for each score. All scores overestimated mortality, but closest concordance between predicted and observed mortality was seen with Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score. Conclusions: The decrease in area under the receiver operating curve seen in subgroups with increasing mortality may explain some variation in results seen in previous validation studies. Scores developed in intensive care settings overestimated mortality in the emergency department. Our results underscore the importance of employing predictive models developed in similar patient populations. The Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score outperformed more complex predictive models and would be the most appropriate scoring system for use in similar emergency department populations with a wide spectrum of mortality risk.

Impact and interest:

37 citations in Scopus
32 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 221268
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Greenslade, Jaimiorcid.org/0000-0002-6970-5573
Measurements or Duration: 9 pages
Keywords: emergency department, mortality, sepsis, severity of illness index, validation studies
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001427
ISSN: 0090-3493
Pure ID: 33044403
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
Current > Schools > School of Psychology & Counselling
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to qut.copyright@qut.edu.au
Deposited On: 06 Nov 2021 15:08
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2024 11:13